Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- doi [2014/01/02 19:35] – rsewikiadmin
+++ doi [2014/01/11 02:54] (current) – rsewikiadmin
@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
-Problem Statement:  When documenting authored publications, academic researchers rely on Digital Object Identifiers ([[http://www.doi.org/]]) assigned to their publications.  In order to encourage the reputation and value of the Series to academic researchers, adding DOIs to all published RFCs is being considered as a possibility.  Using DOIs to uniquely identify publications is considered a standard best practice among the scientific, technical, and medical publishing community.
+Problem Statement:  When documenting authored publications, researchers often rely on Digital Object Identifiers ([[http://www.doi.org/]]) to find, cite, and report on their publication activity.  In some cases, publications do not count as professional publications if a DOI is not assigned.  In order to encourage the reputation and value of the Series to academic researchers, adding DOIs to all published RFCs is being considered as a possibility.  Using DOIs to uniquely identify publications is considered a standard best practice among the scientific, technical, and medical publishing community.
@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
   * Determine cost and potential value
   * Present business case and high level project plan to RSOC
+  * Work with John Levine on DOI draft (see [[http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-levine-doi/]])
@@ Line 19: / Line 20: @@
 RFC Production Center & Publisher Actions:
-  * Create project plan
+  * Determine what programming will be required
+  * Help create project plan
   * Code changes to include information in database, create necessary APIs to register DOI numbers with CrosRef
+  * Adjust Procedures Manual accordingly